| Onshore | Drilling
Program |
 |
The
proposed drilling program will evaluate the best anomalies that
have been identified as a result of the compilation of the recent
exploration effort involving seismic and surface geochemical methods.
Based
on exploration analysis the features range in area from 800 to
12,000 acres. The drilling program will focus on features that
will deliver the best tests of the various play types. Successful
drilling will trigger follow up locations on each prospect. Additional
features have been mapped in the Blackbush and Skeldon areas
using both seismic and geochemical results. One well is planned
in each area to test the features.
The
following illustrations provide results of the testing that has
taken place to determine the drilling locations. A number of
tests have been performed integrating geochemical and seismic
results to examine various features of the 3 to 6 drilling locations
targeted, which are flexible depending on results of these tests.
Also undertaken was testing to assay a number of trap styles.
Both the geochemical and seismic results were acquired over areas
with reasonable access so that drilling could proceed on those
areas without undue expenditures incurred on access and infrastructure.
It should be clearly understood that with success additional
areas are available for exploration within the concession.
|
| |
Figure
1 - Schematic of Berbice Onshore Geology
|
| |
|
| |
This
schematic cross sections how the style and trap potential in the
Berbice region. The area has potential for a combination of structural
and stratigraphic traps as illustrated.
|
| |
The
surface geochemistry is based on three different but related techniques.
The primary assertion is that trapped hydrocarbons will leak at
very slow rates to surface as a result of the buoyancy effect on
the hydrocarbon by the underlying water table (microseepage). The
primary method of measurement is microbial which measures the presence
and amount of microbes that live on the migrating butane. This
is seen in previously published press releases (January 29, 2004),
and shown below in Figure 2. Secondarily, the type of source is
measured by sorbed gas which shows the likely source of the hydrocarbons
(i.e. heavy oil, light oil, wet gas, and dry gas) by evaluating
the ratios of C2 to C4 gases present. In our case the anomalous
microbial samples were then analyzed. The results were dominantly
gas with liquids and light oil. Unfortunately, the acid rich nature
of the Guyana soils precludes good carbonate preservation where
most hydrocarbons would be adsorbed so in order to reconfirm this
measurement during the seismic phase additional geochem samples
were taken at greater depths and tested for Benzene ratios. In
conjunction with this analysis, available oil samples from the
Abary 1 offshore well and the Tambaredjo and Calcutta areas of
Suriname were analyzed for the same ratios. It is clear from this
secondary analysis (Figure 3) that the anomalies in the Berbice
region are closely related to the Abary light oil and not the heavy
oil in Suriname . This is encouraging because light oil has a higher
market price, is easier to refine, has a higher recovery factor
and lower production and development costs on a per barrel basis
than heavy oil.
Figure
2 - Geomicrobial Technologies (GMT)
Geomicrobial
Analysis with Seismic Layout
|
|
|
| |
The
above map highlights the results of the geomicrobial sample analysis
that was undertaken in the fall of 2003 and analyzed in early 2004.
This map also illustrates the areas where the seismic program was
carried out this past spring.
|
Figure
3 - Geomicrobial Technologies (GMT)
Fluorescence
Analysis
|
| |
|
|
"GMT's
fluorescence analysis indicates light crude. More significantly,
the majority of the "anomalous" fluorescence samples have characteristics
consistent with normal to light oil.most with calculated API values
in the 30's.and characteristics more like the Abary oil than the
Suriname oils.GMT"
The
183 km seismic program successfully recorded the first onshore
seismic in the Guyana portion of the Guyana Suriname basin in
over 60 years. The program was focused on a number of the best
features from the aeromag and geochem results. The seismic has
good resolution and quality. The seismic tied the two wells (Rosehall
1 and Skeldon 1) which were drilled in the Berbice region historically.
The Tambaredjo field in Suriname was studied to aid in understanding
the characteristics of that oil deposit to use it as an analogy
in Guyana . Proven reserves on the Tambaredjo field are 1.2 mmbbls
per sq. km.
Line
1 in the Rosehall area ties the Rose 1 well that was drilled
in 1942. The seismic line shown in Rosehall
Line 1 (Figure 4) and Rosehall Line 2 (Figure 5) indicate two basement
features with significant relief which are associated with geochem. At
the same time they show that the original Rosehall well was drilled in
a structural low. The proposed locations also show closure at the level
of the correlative section in both the Pre Cambrian and lower Tertiary.
Rosehall Line 5 (Figure 6) shows additional features in the Rosehall
area which would provide follow up for based on success.
|
Figure
4 - Seismic Interpretation
Rosehall
Line 1- Locations A1 and C |
| |
 |
| |
Figure
5- Seismic Interpretation
Rosehall
Line 2- Locations A2 and E |
| |
|
|
| |
Figure
6 - Seismic Interpretation
Rosehall
Line 5- Locations D and C |
| |
|