| |
September
27, 2007
Dreaming
of oil
The
Economist
An
offshore resolution
It is a thinly populated slice of Atlantic coast backed by a large
tract of rainforest. But Guyana reckons it may have struck riches,
thanks to a decision by a United Nations tribunal on September 20th.
This awarded most of a disputed area of sea to Guyana rather than
its neighbour, Suriname. “Think Kuwait,” dreamed an
upbeat foreign diplomat.
Not quite, or at least not yet. But the United States Geological
Survey reckons that the muddy waters of the Guyana-Suriname basin
may hold more undiscovered oil than the proven reserves of the North
Sea. What has blocked exploration until now has been the confused
borders left behind by former colonial powers. In 2000, a Surinamese
gunboat threatened a rig hired by a small Canadian company, CGX
Energy, halting its search for oil 160km (100 miles) offshore. When
talks failed to find a compromise, Guyana referred the tiff to a
tribunal whose verdict is binding under the UN Convention on the
Law of the Sea.
News of the settlement saw CGX's share price leap to $2.50, up from
26 cents a year ago. But though the geology is promising, nobody
has yet found any oil. Kerry Sully, CGX's president, is bullish
but does not expect to drill before 2009.
If there is oil, some Guyanese fear that it will bring problems—especially
corruption—as well as benefits. They note that in neighbouring
Trinidad oil and natural gas have brought an economic boom but not
an instant fix for social problems. In Guyana political squabbles
have blocked the appointment of a Public Procurement Commission,
a body set up by law four years ago to oversee government contracts.
But the tribunal's ruling brought a rare moment of political harmony.
For perhaps the first time in 50 years, the mainly Afro-Guyanese
opposition People's National Congress hailed a success by its mainly
Indo-Guyanese political foes in the government of President Bharrat
Jagdeo.
In Suriname, the fractious opposition blames the government for
losing, but the damage does not run deep. A Spanish company, Repsol,
plans to drill for oil in its undisputed waters next year, and Denmark's
Maersk, will follow soon after. A separate border dispute over a
triangle of uninhabited rainforest near the Brazilian border remains
unresolved. But there are now strong incentives for the two countries
to collaborate. One promising geological feature, known as the Wishbone
target, straddles the new marine boundary, and cannot be exploited
without an agreement to share whatever it may contain.
A bigger problem for Guyana is its longstanding disagreement with
Venezuela, which claims almost three-quarters of its land area and
a big slice of sea where both CGX and Exxon have Guyanese concessions.
Venezuela's case is weak: it accepted a land border fixed by arbitration
in 1899 only to reject it in the 1960s.
Relations are patchy. Guyana benefits from oil supplied on easy
terms under Petrocaribe, a Venezuelan aid scheme. But there have
been some nasty border incidents: a Guyanese was killed by Venezuelan
national guards last October on the Cuyuni river. Unlike Suriname
and Guyana, but like the United States, Venezuela has not signed
the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Barbados and Trinidad settled
their maritime border by arbitration last year. Time, perhaps, for
Venezuela to learn from its smaller neighbours.
|